From field of dreams to back to the future? Exploring barriers to participating in continuing professional development (CPD) programs.

BACKGROUND: In 2009, Yvonne Steinert et al., at McGill University, published a study exploring barriers to faculty development (FD) participation among urban faculty. Over a decade later, we set out to replicate and expand on that study to learn what has changed in continued professional development (CPD) and what the current barriers are to participation in CPD for specialists and family physicians in rural and urban locations. METHODS: Informed by a collaborative inquiry research framework, we invited faculty across rural and urban Saskatchewan to focus groups and interview sessions. The results were analyzed for themes. RESULTS: Thirty-four faculty members from both rural and urban areas participated in this study. Of these, 50% were female, 74% practiced in urban areas, and 56% had over 20 years of experience. Frequently cited reasons for nonparticipation included time constraints, organizational and logistical challenges, poor resonance with material and presenters, and lack of recognition for teaching provided. Racism contributed to feelings of disconnectedness among physician faculty members. CONCLUSION: Even after more than a decade, our research uncovered consistent reasons for nonparticipation in locally organized CPD events. New findings highlighted feelings of disconnectedness, notably stemming from racism and workplace discrimination. However, with recent societal developments brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic, can we ride these major waves of change to a new future of engagement? The pandemic led to a shift to virtual and hybrid professional development programs, presenting both benefits and challenges. Additionally, the peri-COVID anti-racism movement may positively address previously unidentified reasons for nonattendance. Harnessing these major changes could lead to a new future of engagement for continued professional development.

Dress and deportment of medical residents: formal or informal?

PURPOSE: Health care workers, including physicians, have adopted more casual dress. The appearance of a physician may influence patients' opinion of physician knowledge, competence and trustworthiness. We hypothesized that medical inpatients and outpatients would rate these attributes higher in residents who dressed and acted in a more formal manner. METHODS: Prospective cohort included both inpatients and outpatients. One hundred thirty three patients, aged 62.3 ± 16 years, 49% of whom were female, were surveyed. One of two male resident physicians approached each patient, ostensibly to obtain consent to a brief mini-mental status examination. The physician was dressed, and acted, either "formally" (F) or "informally" (I). Patients then completed a six item questionnaire, using a 5 point Likert scale, to assess their confidence in the resident. Total scores could be 6 to 30. Total scores were compared using one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: Patients' perceptions were high for both F and I: 25.5 ± 3.1 vs. 24.1 ± 3.0, respectively (p=0.013). This difference was driven by the "lab coat" question: patients generally preferred physicians to wear a lab coat (3.9 ± 1.0 vs. 2.8 ± 1.3, p < 0.0001). Responses to four of the other five questions were numerically, but not statistically, higher in F. There was no difference in preference between the two residents: 24.6 ± 2.8 vs. 24.9 ± 3.5, p=0.56. CONCLUSION: More formal dress and demeanor by residents leads to a modest, but significant, increase in patient perception of the resident's value. Wearing a white lab coat, in particular, has a positive effect.